Global Arbitration Review has released its shortlists for the GAR Awards 2020, including the shortlist for the Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge Award (Pledge Award).
ArbitralWomen is honoured that the ArbitralWomen Diversity Toolkit™ – a bespoke training programme designed to help us see the role played by biases and explore ways to address and overcome them – is among the diversity initiatives shortlisted for the Pledge Award.
Voting is now open for the GAR Awards 2020. GAR subscribers can login and cast their vote here. Voting will close at midnight in London on 1 March. Since so many of us travel to and live in many different time zones around the world, we suggest that those who wish to vote do so by no later than 29 February.
We have set out below the Pledge Award shortlist. Congratulations to all the diversity initiatives that have been shortlisted, many of which are led by ArbitralWomen Members and to which ArbitralWomen has provided its support. While ArbitralWomen would be delighted to win the Pledge Award this year, it is important to recognise that all the shortlisted initiatives contribute to our common goal to promote gender parity and diversity in dispute resolution. The Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge itself, now with more than 4,000 signatories globally, is also deserving of congratulations for its substantial work to promote diversity. Indeed, GAR awarded the Arbitration Pledge “Best Development in Arbitration” in 2017.
Regardless of the winner of this year's Pledge Award, the shortlist has already put so many worthy diversity initiatives in the spotlight. It is encouraging to see such progress being achieved and pursued on so many fronts.
Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge Award Shortlist:
ArbitralWomen Diversity Toolkit™ training programmes (rolled out during 2019)
JAMS introduces an optional diversity and inclusion rider to its standard arbitration clauses and appoints a diversity programme manager (October 2019)
WWA-LATAM initiative (Women Way in Arbitration Latin America) launched to promote women in arbitration in Latin America (June 2019)
Lucy Greenwood’s continued efforts to collate data and report on female arbitrator appointment statistics (October 2019)
43% of LCIA appointments for 2018 were of female arbitrators (reported 1 April 2019)
AmCham Peru appoints a majority of female court members (December 2019)
Katherine Simpson provided CETA signatories with a list of 70 experienced women trade experts for inclusion in the CETA List of Arbitrators (January 2020)
All three Vice Presidents at the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry are female (last two appointments made in January and October 2019)
Finally, there are many other important GAR award categories for which individuals, entities and initiatives have been shortlisted. ArbitralWomen naturally focuses on the diversity nominations but does not in any way mean to diminish the importance of all the GAR awards. You are encouraged to cast your vote for all award categories!
You can delete your CV file if you do not want it to be accessible on the site.
Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams
Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.
Following are the conditions for the funding:
Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
Criteria of selection:
The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
Priority will be given to teams:
who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
who have no support from their universities or no coach;
who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.