At the 1-5 April 2019 session at United Nations headquarters in New York, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Working Group III considered its next steps toward proposed reforms for the current investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system.
With 54 government members, another 50 governments and the European Union as observers, and representatives of some 70 international organizations—including ArbitralWomen—in attendance at the New York meetings, Working Group III is one of the most high-profile initiatives in recent debates about ISDS reform.
In prior phases, Working Group III focused on identifying concerns about ISDS and reaching consensus on the desirability of pursuing reforms to address them. Three main categories of concerns are in play:
lack of consistency, coherence, predictability and correctness of arbitral decisions;
conduct of arbitrators and decision makers; and
cost and duration of proceedings.
The current, third phase is focused on developing ISDS reform proposals. After a session on third-party funding to complete the discussion of ISDS concerns from prior meetings, the New York meeting debated options for framing the work plan going forward. Proposals to prioritize potential reforms with the highest level of consensus (supported by the United States), or to split into workstreams focused on incremental and systemic reforms (supported by the EU), were discussed at length.
Ultimately, the Working Group agreed to focus simultaneously on multiple potential reform solutions. Structural reform will be one of those solutions, and proposals for the other solutions to be developed are being solicited (due 15 July 2019) for discussion at the next meeting, which is tentatively set for 14-18 October 2019 in Vienna, Austria.
Working Group III’s formal report on the session is available at: https://undocs.org/en/A/CN.9/970Submitted by ArbitralWomen Member Marinn Carlson, co-leader of the Global Arbitration, Trade and Advocacy Practice at Sidley Austin LLP. Marinn attended the April 2019 Working Group III session as an observer on behalf of ArbitralWomen.
You can delete your CV file if you do not want it to be accessible on the site.
Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams
Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.
Following are the conditions for the funding:
Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
Criteria of selection:
The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
Priority will be given to teams:
who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
who have no support from their universities or no coach;
who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.