Lack of diversity in arbitration is a well-documented problem. Women account for only about a fifth of arbitrators, and ethnic diversity is largely absent. A 2021 survey by White & Case found that 61% of respondents agreed that some gender diversity progress has been made in recent years, but less than a third felt similarly about ethnic diversity.
Burford Capital reviews hundreds of billions of dollars in commercial disputes annually, but since its inception in 2009, of the thousands of matters brought to it each year for funding, less than 5% had a woman in a leading role, and even fewer were led by people of colour. In 2018, Burford launched The Equity Project, a $50 million pool of capital earmarked to back litigation and arbitration led by women. As of December 31, 2020, Burford had committed nearly $57 million to matters led by women.
Building on this success, in October 2021 Burford announced its expansion of The Equity Project with an additional $100 million and broadening its mission to address both female and racially diverse lawyers.
In earmarking capital through The Equity Project, Burford seeks to provide lawyers who have been historically underrepresented in the business of law an edge as they pursue leadership positions in significant commercial litigations and arbitrations.
Further, when Equity Project investments resolve successfully, Burford will contribute on behalf of the client some of Burford’s profits to a charitable organisation focused on advancing the careers of female and diverse lawyers.
Arbitration is a focus area for Burford and the Equity Project. Of the 25 global Equity Project Champions—men and women who help Burford ensure that female and racially diverse lawyers are aware of the capital available—nine are leaders in international arbitration and dispute resolution. Further, of the nearly $57 million committed in phase one of The Equity Project, 24% was committed to support women-led international arbitration claims.
Arbitration claims that may qualify for Equity Project financing include matters where a female or racially diverse lawyer is first or second chair, serves as lead counsel, earns the origination credit, is the client-relationship manager, or where the client is being represented by a law firm that is owned by female or racially diverse lawyers.
Maria Eugenia Ramirez commented: “I am delighted to have been invited to join the next phase of The Equity Project as an Equity Project Champion, and I look forward to its continuing growth throughout 2022.”
We are pleased to share this announcement and requests for more information: [email protected].
Submitted by Aviva Will, Co-Chief Operating Officer of Burford Capital, ArbitralWomen member and Founder of The Equity Project, and Maria Eugenia Ramirez, Partner at Hogan Lovells, ArbitralWomen member and Equity Project Champion.
You can delete your CV file if you do not want it to be accessible on the site.
Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams
Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.
Following are the conditions for the funding:
Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
Criteria of selection:
The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
Priority will be given to teams:
who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
who have no support from their universities or no coach;
who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organizing authority, may request the organizing authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.