ArbitralWomen Logo
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
    • Individual Membership
      Corporate Membership
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
  • Login
Contacts,
Name Details
Katrina Limond
  • Publications:

    English High Court refuses enforcement of crypto award on public policy grounds, Allen & Overy, September 2023 (upcoming) The impact of corruption allegations on post-arbitral award proceedings: enforcement and set aside, TL4 magazine, September 2023 (upcoming) Explaining the why and how of IP arbitration, Managing IP, August 2023 The ICJ and the climate crisis—what an advisory opinion could mean for international law and co-operation, LexisNexis, April 2023 UNCITRAL’s new draft model clauses target technology disputes, Allen & Overy, March 2023 Enforcement of arbitration awards against States – court documents must be served through diplomatic channels, Allen & Overy, Nov 2021 Which law governs an arbitration agreement where the governing law of the main contract and the seat of arbitration do not match? Allen & Overy, April 2020 Drafting UK updates, managing UK contributions and editing Young ITA Newsletter, since August 2021 Diverging attitudes to international arbitration in East Africa, African Law & Business, March 2019 Cohesion between the international human rights and international investment regimes, A&O Business & Human Rights Review, Sept 2016 A new arbitration law for Myanmar, Practical Law Arbitration, Mar 2016 Who is the most influential arbitrator in the world? Global Arbitration Review, Jan 2016 Increased transparency at the ICC Court of Arbitration, Allen & Overy, Oct 2015 Investment Treaty Arbitration know-how for Rwanda, Global Arbitration Review, 2015

  • Education:

    Admitted as a solicitor, England and Wales, 2014 M.A. (Hons), University of Cambridge, Clare College, Law, 2010, 1st class Licence III, Université Paris II (Panthéon-Assas), French Law, 2009 Legal Practice Course, The College of Law, London, 2012, Distinction

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Public international Law
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational, Professional Proficiency: Understand written documents
London, GB
Fabienne El-Cid
Danielle Griffiths
Adriana Abu Abara
Annabel Maltby
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
Marie Gachet
Magdalena Prus
Mounia Larbaoui
Eleanor Erney
  • Education:

    J.D., Georgetown University Law Center

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
Washington, US
Rebecca Gosden
  • Education:

    ACA, ICAEW

    Masters in Mathematics, Kings College London

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Commercial Law, Construction - Engineering, Corporate Law, Energy - Natural Resources, Finance - Banking, Information - Communication Technologies, Oil - Gas - Mining, Technical expertise, Trade - Industry
London, GB
Penny Wilson
Giulia Vallar
  • Education:
    • J.D., University of Milan summa cum laude, 2010
    • Ph.D. in Private International Law, University of Milan, 2013
    • LL.M. in International Legal Studies, NYU School of Law, 2017
  • Jurisdiction: Italy
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Lawyer
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Italian
Nadia Hubbuck
  • State Contact: Please select a region, state or province.
  • Publications: International Law Recourse for Potential Expropriation of Foreign Assets by Russia, Lexology, May 2022 Beware of a Russian torpedo: the impact on arbitration agreements of sanctions-related amendments to Russian procedural law, PLC Arbitration Blog, April 2021; The emergency arbitrator is officially a teenager, PLC Arbitration Blog, April 2020; Rasstavit tocki nad i: the lessons learnt from recent judgments of the Russian courts on the enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards, PLC Arbitration Blog, October 2018; Validity of notices and requests for arbitration: when context and rules are key factors, PLC Arbitration Blog, February 2018; Arbitration institutions: an insider’s perspective, RAA Newsletter, Issue 7, 2017; Third party funding and pitfalls of privilege, PLC Arbitration Blog, June 2017; The curious case of state immunity: how to avoid a Pyrrhic victory, PLC Arbitration Blog, August 2016; and The Resolution of Disputes at the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA): Practical Aspects - Russian Law Journal, Vol. II (2014), Issue 2.
  • Education: SCC / SAA Diploma course on international arbitration for foreign arbitrators - June 2022 Queen Mary University of London, September 2014 – November 2015 Post-Graduate Diploma in International and Investment Arbitration The University of Law, 2008 - 2009 Legal Practice Course The Nottingham Law School, 2003 - 2004 Graduate Diploma in English Law University of Manchester/Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences, 2000 - 2001 Master of Laws in International Law State Law University, Moscow, 1993 - 1998 LLB (Hons), Degree in Jurisprudence
  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: Russian Federation, United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Investment - Concession agreements, Mediation, Public international Law
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British, Russian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency:
    • Language(s): Russian, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency:
London, Please select a region, state or province., GB
Roaa Abou Assi
Courtney Furner
Eva Chan
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American, Canadian, Chinese
Lourdes Luna
  • Publications:

    Raj Prakash, Lourdes Luna. "Manage risks: A continuing duty with

    assured benefits". SoCLA (Society of Construction Law Australia). 2022.

    Lourdes Luna. "How can I seek for a precautionary measure? - An

    overview about precautionary measures when there is an agreement to

    submit every claim to a dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) and the

    peruvian dispute board". Construction: contracts, management and

    disputes, Themis Editorial. 2022

    Contributor of the "Cybersecurity Roadmap: Federated States of

    Micronesia", Oceania Cyber Security Centre y Universidad de Monash,

    2022

  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Administrative Law, Arbitration, Construction - Engineering, DRB (Dispute resolution board) - DAB (Dispute adjudication board), Infrastructure
  • Legal System: Civil Law
Carmen Martinez Lopez
Sandrina Antohi
  • Education: McGill University, Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL), Bachelor of Common Law (LLB), 2010 New York University, Master of Laws in International Legal Studies (LLM), 2012
  • Firm Country: France
  • Jurisdiction: France
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Construction - Engineering, Corporate Law, Energy - Natural Resources, Environment, Finance - Banking, Infrastructure, Intellectual Property, Investment - Concession agreements, Joint Ventures - Consortia - Cooperation, Oil - Gas - Mining, Public international Law, Sales - Purchases
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Canadian, Romanian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Romanian, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational, Professional Proficiency: Understand written documents
Paris, FR
Stephanie Leung

Page 29 of 57

  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
ArbitralWomen Policies

ArbitralWomen Privacy Policy

ArbitralWomen Terms of Use

ArbitralWomen Membership Agreement

ArbitralWomen Cookies' Policy

© 2026 ArbitralWomen. Designed By SmartFrog Criações
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
    • Privacy Request
    • Privacy Extend Consent
    • Alter Reports Tests
    • Form Test
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Site Search

Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams

Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.

Following are the conditions for the funding:

  1. Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
  2. The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
  3. Criteria of selection:
    • The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
    • The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
    • Priority will be given to teams:
      • who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
      • who have no support from their universities or no coach;
      • who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
      • of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
  4. An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
  5. Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
  6. The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
  7. Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
  8. Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.
CLOSE