ArbitralWomen Logo
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
    • Individual Membership
      Corporate Membership
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
  • Login
Contacts,
Name Details
Jelita Pandjaitan
Lindsay Reimschussel
  • Education: J.D., Harvard Law School
  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Italian, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational, Professional Proficiency: Testify orally, Understand written documents
London, GB
Grace Hauser
Judith Mulholland
Viola Donzelli
Silvia Baroffio
Kinjal Shah
  • State Contact: Ontario
  • Firm Country: Canada
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Brenda Horrigan
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Please see CV

  • Publications:

    Please see CV

  • Education:

    JD Columbia University Law School; BA Grinnell College

  • Other Information:

    Please see CV

  • Firm Country: Singapore
  • Speaking Engagements:

    Please see CV

  • Jurisdiction: Australia, France, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Russian, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Understand written documents
Singapore, SG
Stefanie Pfisterer
Lisa Johnson
Sarah Lainchbury
Smriti Nair
  • State Contact: Delhi
  • Publications:
    • “Bombay High Court's Split Verdict On The 2023 Amendment To The IT Rules” published on Mondaq on 6 May 2024 (https://www.mondaq.com/india/it-and-internet/1435756/bombay-high-courts-split-verdict-on-the-2023-amendment-to-the-it-rules)
    • Noida dues not financial debt under IBC: Supreme Court” published on ERGO Newsflash- A blog by Khaitan & Co. on 24 May 2022 (https://www.khaitanco.com/thought-leaderships/Noida-dues-not-financial-debt-under-IBC-Supreme-Court)
    • 'Allottees in Real Estate Projects cannot be Coerced into Settlements by NCLT: Supreme Court' published on Lexology on 3 January 2022 (https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fb9ffabd-82f5-42b2-bd8f-3e8bd53a4c08)
    • 'Supreme Court orders an independent investigation into the Pegasus spyware attack' published on Mondaq on 3 November 2021 (https://www.mondaq.com/india/privacy-protection/1127684/supreme-court-orders-an-independent-investigation-into-the-pegasus-spyware-attack)
    • 'Hard bargain for resolution applicants; No scope for withdrawal of plans: Supreme Court' published on Mondaq on 28 September 2021 (https://www.mondaq.com/india/insolvencybankruptcy/1115658/hard-bargain-for-resolution-applicants-no-scope-for-withdrawal-of-plans-supreme-court)
    • 'NCLTs have no equity jurisdiction under IBC: Supreme Court' published on Bar and Bench on 20 September 2021 (https://www.barandbench.com/columns/nclt-has-no-equity-jurisdiction-under-ibc-supreme-court)
    • 'A Personal Guarantor’s Pandemic: IBC Suspension and its Repercussions' published on Live Law on 29 May 2020 (https://www.livelaw.in/columns/a-personal-guarantors-pandemic-ibc-suspension-and-its-repercussions-157562)
    • 'Supreme Court reinforces timelines under RDB Act' published on Lexology on 24 February 2020 and on Mondaq on 26 February 2020 (https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=29bd9e80-e85a-4224-a1e0-020699b41326)
    • 'The Essar Steel Saga: Supreme Court brings much needed clarity to IBC' published on Mondaq on 28 November 2019 (https://www.mondaq.com/india/insolvencybankruptcy/869318/the-essar-steel-saga-supreme-court-brings-much-needed-clarity-to-ibc )
  • Education:

    LL.M. in Corporate and Commercial Law, London School of Economics and Political Science

    BA.LL.B. (Hons.), Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

  • Firm Country: India
  • Jurisdiction: India
  • Type of Practitioner: Lawyer
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Commercial Law, Corporate Law, Insolvency, Intellectual Property
  • Legal System: Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Indian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Hindi, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient
    • Language(s): Malayalam, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
NewDelhi, Delhi, IN
Georgina Rawson
Nika Rassadina
Kristina Danilova
Julie Bedard
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    U.S. Legal Methods and Problems

  • Education: J.S.D., Columbia University School of Law, 2006; LL.M. Columbia University School of Law, 2001
  • Other Information: N/A
    U.S. Legal Methods and Problems
  • Firm Country: United States
  • Jurisdiction: France, United States, Canada
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, European Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: French
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): Italian, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): , Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): Romanian, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
New York, NY, US
Farncesca Gesualdi
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Lawyer
Shruti Khanijow IN
Isabelle Berger
Ashley Riveira
  • Education:

    Harvard Law School, J.D. (2006)

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Energy - Natural Resources, Hotel - Leisure management, Investment - Concession agreements, Oil - Gas - Mining
  • Legal System: Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American

Page 43 of 57

  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
ArbitralWomen Policies

ArbitralWomen Privacy Policy

ArbitralWomen Terms of Use

ArbitralWomen Membership Agreement

ArbitralWomen Cookies' Policy

© 2026 ArbitralWomen. Designed By SmartFrog Criações
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
    • Privacy Request
    • Privacy Extend Consent
    • Alter Reports Tests
    • Form Test
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Site Search

Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams

Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.

Following are the conditions for the funding:

  1. Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
  2. The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
  3. Criteria of selection:
    • The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
    • The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
    • Priority will be given to teams:
      • who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
      • who have no support from their universities or no coach;
      • who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
      • of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
  4. An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
  5. Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
  6. The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
  7. Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
  8. Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.
CLOSE