ArbitralWomen Logo
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
    • Individual Membership
      Corporate Membership
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
  • Login
Contacts,
Name Details
Dana Hayes
Gisele Stephens-Chu
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Over fifteen years' experience in international arbitration (commercial and investor-State)

  • Publications:

    Published in numerous journals on arbitration and French, English and international law topics (see CV)

  • Education:

    LLB (Cambridge), Licence en droit (Poitiers), Diploma in Legal Practice

  • Other Information:

    Over twenty years' experience in international arbitration (commercial and investor-State) 

  • Firm Country: France
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel, Lawyer
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Energy - Natural Resources, Information - Communication Technologies, Infrastructure, Investment - Concession agreements, Joint Ventures - Consortia - Cooperation, Oil - Gas - Mining, Public international Law, Sales - Purchases, Trade - Industry, Transport
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British, French
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): German, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Understand written documents
Paris, FR
Ruxandra Esanu
  • Publications:

    Churchill Mining Plc and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia - ICSID Reports, pp. 527-553 (2020)

    The State of Necessity in Public Health Emergency Measures: A Proposition from the Latin American Experience, Transnational Dispute Management (2022) (co-author)

  • Education:

    Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po), B.A., Political Science, 2010

    Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po), M.A., Economic Law, 2013, Member of the winning team at the Latin American Commercial Arbitration Moot (Bogotá) 2013

    Paris Bar School, CAPA, 2015

  • Firm Country: France
  • Jurisdiction: France
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Civil Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Romanian
Juliette Luycks
Allison Torline
  • Education:

    JD - The George Washington University Law School; BA (Political Science and International Studies) - Indiana University

  • Firm Country: Germany
  • Jurisdiction: Germany, United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Lawyer
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Commercial Law, Construction - Engineering, Corporate Law, Infrastructure, Investment - Concession agreements, Public international Law, Sales - Purchases, Trade - Industry
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): German, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
FrankfurtamMain, DE
Catrice Gayer
Ciara Ros
Amina Afifi
Tina Benson
Camilla Perera - de Wit
Inken Knief
Evelien Van Espen
Yan Zhang
Tasneem Azad
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Testifying expert (quantum, factual liability) and economics (competition and regulation)

  • Publications:

    Various

  • Education:

    MSc Economics & Philosophy, BSc Economics

  • Other Information:

    Testifying expert (quantum, factual liability) and economics (competition and regulation)

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert
  • Practice Areas: Antitrust Law, Arbitration, Commercial Law, Competition, Finance - Banking, Information - Communication Technologies
Sophie Thiel
  • State Contact: Bayern
  • Firm Country: Germany
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Nationality/Nationalities: German
  • Select Languages:
    • Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
Munich, Bayern, DE
Carmel Proudfoot
Rhianna Hoover
Buuruljin Enkhbold
Lorraine de Germiny
Liz Snodgrass

Page 42 of 57

  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
ArbitralWomen Policies

ArbitralWomen Privacy Policy

ArbitralWomen Terms of Use

ArbitralWomen Membership Agreement

ArbitralWomen Cookies' Policy

© 2026 ArbitralWomen. Designed By SmartFrog Criações
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
    • Privacy Request
    • Privacy Extend Consent
    • Alter Reports Tests
    • Form Test
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Site Search

Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams

Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.

Following are the conditions for the funding:

  1. Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
  2. The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
  3. Criteria of selection:
    • The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
    • The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
    • Priority will be given to teams:
      • who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
      • who have no support from their universities or no coach;
      • who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
      • of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
  4. An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
  5. Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
  6. The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
  7. Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
  8. Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.
CLOSE