ArbitralWomen Logo
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
    • Individual Membership
      Corporate Membership
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
  • Login
Contacts,
Name Details
Rebecca Mee
Stuti Gadodia
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Associate, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (March 2017 - present)

  • Publications:

    TDM (2) 2018, The State Doesn't Strike Back After All: India's Final Model BIT Takes The Bite Out Of Investor Obligations And Eliminates State Counterclaims; Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Volume 6, Issue 1 (July 2017) What does the future hold for foreign pharmaceutical companies in India? Investment Arbitration for pharmaceutical companies in the Indian context

  • Education:

    The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies and University of Geneva (MIDS LLM in International Dispute Settlement); Government Law College, University of Mumbai (Bachelor of Laws - LLB)

  • Other Information:

    Associate, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (March 2017 - present)

  • Firm Country: Germany
  • Jurisdiction: India
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Common Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Indian
Courtney Furner
Dewi Padi
Eliana Baraldi
Kirsteen Cacchioli
  • State Contact: Choose One...
  • Education:

    LLB (Hons)

    MCIArb

    MCIOB

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert, Forensic Consultant
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
London, Choose One..., GB
Sheng Bi
Nathalie Colin
Pauline Booth
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Quantum expert in commercial and intellectual property infringement disputes with clients across a wide range of industries and geographic regions, including U.K., U.S., Canada, Asia and Europe.

  • Other Information:

    Quantum expert in commercial and intellectual property infringement disputes with clients across a wide range of industries and geographic regions, including U.K., U.S., Canada, Asia and Europe.

  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom, United States, Sweden, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Canada, China, Singapore
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Intellectual Property, Joint Ventures - Consortia - Cooperation, Technology Transfer
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
Xiaohan Cai
  • Education:

    National University of Singapore

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: Singapore, United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Agency - Distribution - Franchising, Arbitration, Construction - Engineering, Hotel - Leisure management
  • Legal System: Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Singaporean
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): Chinese Simplified, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency
GB
Rose Marie Wong
  • Publications:
    • Contributor to The International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution’s Guidelines for Arbitrator Disclosure (2024).

    • Mesa Power v. Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, 20 ICSID Rep 267 (Eduardo Silva Romero, David L. Attanasio and Rose Marie Wong 2022). 

    • Caratube International v. Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/12, 19 ICSID Rep 423 (Eduardo Silva Romero, David L. Attanasio, Rose Marie Wong, and Panos Theodoropoulos 2021).

  • Education:

    Rose Marie received her Bachelor of Arts degree in English and History (summa cum laude) from the University of Scranton in 2012 and her Juris Doctor degree from Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (magna cum laude) in 2015.

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Speaking Engagements:
    • Panelist in "The Digital Divide in International Cyber Law" for the American Branch of the International Law Association’s International Law Weekend (October 24, 2025)
    • Moderated the APABA-PA Annual Banquet (October 6, 2023) 
    • Panelist in “Breaking the Bamboo Ceiling” (April 18, 2023) 
    • Moderated the “Accountability in Internet Governance” Panel for the American Branch of the International Law Association’s International Law Weekend (October 22, 2022) 
    • Moderated “Demystifying Privilege: Key Types of Privilege and their Application in International Disputes” (June 25, 2021)
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Academic, Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Construction - Engineering, Domain names, Energy - Natural Resources, Finance - Banking, Information - Communication Technologies, Investment - Concession agreements, Joint Ventures - Consortia - Cooperation, ODR (Online dispute resolution), Public international Law
  • Legal System: Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
London, GB
Claudia Bosco
  • Firm Country: Italy
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Commercial Law, Construction - Engineering, Corporate Law, Sales - Purchases
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Italian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): Italian, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational, Professional Proficiency: Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
Milan, IT
Victoria Clark
  • State Contact: London
  • Publications:

    http://www.blplaw.com/expertlegalinsights/articles/timelimitsforawardsthedangerofdeadlines; http://www.blplaw.com/expertlegalinsights/articles/notqualifiedthelessonsoftonicstar

    https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/the-arbitration-act-2024-an-aggregation-of-marginal-gains.html

    https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/ai-in-ia-the-rise-of-machine-learning.html

    https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/time-limits-for-awards-the-danger-of-deadlines.html

    https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/beware-the-hybrid-arbitration-clause.html

  • Education:

    St Hugh's College, Oxford

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Lawyer
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Infrastructure, Insurance, Mediation, Technical expertise
  • Legal System: Common Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
Jessica Killeen
Christina Beharry
  • State Contact: DC
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Canadian government

  • Education:

    LSE, Cambridge, Columbia

  • Other Information:

    Canadian government

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Jurisdiction: United States, Canada, United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Expert
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Common Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Canadian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
Washington, DC, US
Ana Sofia Pirnia
  • State Contact: DC
  • Education:

    J.D., Columbia Law School;

    M.S., Economic Law, Sciences Po Paris;

    B.A., Community Health, International Relations, Tufts University

  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Oil - Gas - Mining, Public international Law
  • Legal System: Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American, Mexican
Caline Mouawad
  • Education:

    Harvard Law School, J.D. 2001, Rice University, B.A. 1997

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Lawyer
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American, Lebanese
Katie Contos
Aviva Will
Filippa Exelin

Page 12 of 57

  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
ArbitralWomen Policies

ArbitralWomen Privacy Policy

ArbitralWomen Terms of Use

ArbitralWomen Membership Agreement

ArbitralWomen Cookies' Policy

© 2026 ArbitralWomen. Designed By SmartFrog Criações
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
    • Privacy Request
    • Privacy Extend Consent
    • Alter Reports Tests
    • Form Test
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Site Search

Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams

Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.

Following are the conditions for the funding:

  1. Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
  2. The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
  3. Criteria of selection:
    • The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
    • The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
    • Priority will be given to teams:
      • who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
      • who have no support from their universities or no coach;
      • who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
      • of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
  4. An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
  5. Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
  6. The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
  7. Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
  8. Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.
CLOSE