ArbitralWomen Logo
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
    • Individual Membership
      Corporate Membership
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
  • Login
Contacts,
Name Details
Mrinalini Singh
Sonya Ebermann
  • Education:

    Columbia Law School; Sciences Po Paris Law School; Sorbonne University Paris

  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Jurisdiction: United Kingdom, France
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Civil Law, Common Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: French, German
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): German, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational, Professional Proficiency: Understand written documents
London, GB
Rachel Turner
Anne Vanderkamp
Magdalena Prus
Vanessa Thieffry
Alexandra Seymour
  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert
  • Nationality/Nationalities: British
GB
Nadia Nicolaou
Sarah Morreau
Svetlana Portman
  • Firm Country: United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency
    • Language(s): Hebrw, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency
    • Language(s): Russian, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
    • Language(s): , Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
GB
Georgina Warden
Franziska Studer
Zoé Koray
  • Publications:

    Le préjudice de l'actionnaire ("Shareholder Damages"), thèse dir. D. Cohen, Editions Larcier, 2022;

    « La tierce opposition de l'actionnaire. Appréciation critique» («Third party opposition of the shareholder. Critical Approach»), JCP G 2023, p. 755

    Blockchain, Smart Contracts and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Gide Publication, 2023

    « Le préjudice de l'actionnaire » ("Shareholder Damages"), RPS-TRV 2021/2, p. 178

    « Le dirigeant d'une EURL ou d'une SAS n'est pas commerçant : la clause attributive de juridiction n'est pas valable même insérée dans un acte portant cession de contrôle » ("The director of a EURL or SAS is not a trader: the jurisdiction clause is not valid even if it is inserted in a deed transferring control"), Cass. com. 29 janv. 2020, n° 19-12.584, Recueil Dalloz 2020, p. 868

    « Spoliation d'oeuvres d'art et droit international » ("Spoliation of Art Works and International Law"), Dalloz Chronique 2019, p. 1615;

    « Compte courant d'associé, action paulienne et libéralisation de la pratique » ("Current Account of the Shareholder, Paulian Action and Liberalization of the Practice"), Cass. com. 15 mai 2019, n° 18-10.403, JCP E 2019, 1562;

    « Liquidation judiciaire, violation du délai raisonnable et préjudice réparable » ("Judical Liquidation, Violation of the Reasonable Time, Reparable Damage"), Cass. com. 14 nov. 2019, n°17-16.058), Bulletin Joly Entreprises en difficulté 2020, n° 1, p. 26

  • Education:

    PhD, Paris-Panthéon-Assas, Shareholder Damages, under the supervision of Prof. Daniel Cohen

  • Firm Country: France
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Civil Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: French, Turkish
Paris, FR
Sheng Bi
Katie-Beth Jones
Christina Beharry
  • State Contact: DC
  • Other Relevant Experience:

    Canadian government

  • Education:

    LSE, Cambridge, Columbia

  • Other Information:

    Canadian government

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Jurisdiction: United States, Canada, United Kingdom
  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Expert
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration
  • Legal System: Common Law, European Law, International Law
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Canadian
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient
    • Language(s): Spanish, Speaking Proficiency: Conversational
Washington, DC, US
Kimberly Reome
  • State Contact: Illinois
  • Publications:

    “Nuclear Renaissance – Avoiding New Generation Reactor Construction Issues,” Commercial Dispute Resolution, March 2025

    “The Coming Wave of Construction Disputes – Supply Chain Disruptions and Material Price Increases,” Co-Author, Who’s Who Legal, October 2022

    “Don’t Let the Poppies Slow You Down – Flow-down, Delay and Liquidated Damages Provisions,” Co-Author, Paper presented at American Bar Association (ABA) Forum on Construction Law 2018 Midwinter Program, January 2018 

    “CFMA’s Study Guide for the CCIFP [Certified Construction Industry Financial Professional] Exam, 2017–18,” Co-Author, Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA), January 2017

    “Spent Nuclear Fuel and the U.S. Response to Fukushima,” Co-Author, Energy Litigation, a publication of the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Litigation Energy Litigation Committee, Fall 2011

    “Nuclear Energy Powers Up, But Challenges Remain...,” Co-Author, Trends, a publication of the ABA Section of Environment, Energy and Resources, November/December 2010

    “Nuclear Waste Issue Persists as New Plants Forge Ahead,” Co-Author, Ecopolitology, April 2010

    “DOE’s Non-Performance on Permanent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Costs Billions,” Co-Author, Ecopolitology, November 2009

    “A Lack of Performance on Nuclear Waste Storage,” Co-Author, Nuclear Street, July 2009

    “Nonperformance on Nuclear Waste Storage,” Co-Author, Law360, April 2009

    “Serving Clients by Managing Your Experts and Consultants: Up-Front Planning and Regular Communications Are Essential,” Co-Author, Of Counsel, Aspen Publishers, July 2008

    “Expert Use in Claims of Construction Defects and Code Violations,” Co-Author, Construct!, a publication of the ABA Construction Litigation Committee, Spring 2007

  • Education:

    Masters of Business Administration (MBA), Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, USA

    Bachelor of Arts (BA), Finance, Michigan State University Honors College, USA

  • Other Information:

    Certified Construction Industry Financial Professional (CCIFP)

    Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE)

  • Firm Country: United States
  • Speaking Engagements:

    Lectured at seminars on accounting, nuclear power, construction damages, delay, fraud, and contractual issues for various organizations, including Northwestern University School of Engineering; American Bar Association Forum on Construction Law; American Bar Association Litigation Section, Construction Litigation and Expert Witness Committees; Construction SuperConference; Construction Financial Management Association; National Association of Women in Construction; Construction Owners Association of America; National Contract Management Association; National Subcontractors Alliance; Chicago Bar Association; Lorman Education; and law firms. 

  • Jurisdiction: United States
  • Type of Practitioner: Expert, Forensic Consultant
  • Practice Areas: Construction - Engineering, Energy - Natural Resources, Infrastructure
  • Nationality/Nationalities: American
Chicago, Illinois, US
Kamalia Mehtiyeva
  • Education:

    PhD, Sorbonne Law School

  • Type of Practitioner: Arbitrator, Counsel, Expert
  • Practice Areas: Arbitration, Corporate Law, Criminal Law, Energy - Natural Resources, Environment, Investment - Concession agreements, Maritime Law, Sales - Purchases
  • Nationality/Nationalities: Azerbaijani, French
  • Select Languages:
    • Language(s): Azerbaijani, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): English, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): French, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Russian, Speaking Proficiency: Native Fluency, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
    • Language(s): Turkish, Speaking Proficiency: Proficient, Professional Proficiency: Conduct DR proceedings, Represent clients as an advocate in DR proceedings, Testify orally, Draft opinions, reports, agreements, decisions, orders or awards, Understand written documents
Laurie Achtouk-Spivak
Marie-Isabelle Delleur

Page 52 of 57

  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
ArbitralWomen Policies

ArbitralWomen Privacy Policy

ArbitralWomen Terms of Use

ArbitralWomen Membership Agreement

ArbitralWomen Cookies' Policy

© 2026 ArbitralWomen. Designed By SmartFrog Criações
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board and Committees
  • Membership
    • Individual Membership
    • Corporate Membership
    • Our Corporate Subscribers
  • Our Members
    • Practitioners Database
    • Members Directory
  • YAWP
    • About YAWP
    • YAWP Steering Committee
    • YAWP Events
  • AW Resources
    • ArbitralWomen Materials
    • News About AW Members
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • Publications
    • AW-Kluwer Arbitration Blog
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Event Reports
    • YAWP Events
    • Submit Event
    • Full Calendar
  • Programmes
    • Education & Competitions
    • Mentorship
    • Parental Mentorship
    • Diversity Toolkit
    • Gender Equality
    • Champion for Change
  • Cooperation
    • Partnership
    • Privacy Request
    • Privacy Extend Consent
    • Alter Reports Tests
    • Form Test
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • Site Search

Policy on Funding Moot Competition Teams

Each year ArbitralWomen provides support to a number of Teams who participate in dispute resolution competitions, such as the Vis or Vis East International Arbitration Moot by covering their registration fee.

Following are the conditions for the funding:

  1. Any qualified team requesting financial assistance must complete an application form providing details of the teams, resources, and the reason for the requested assistance. The application form is available on the website, and may be amended from time to time as the Board deems appropriate.
  2. The Board, through its Moot Bursary Committee, shall consider all applications received and decide which team(s) shall be supported through payment of its(their) registration fee to compete. In general, teams selected will be from different countries. Applications filed after the deadline will be disregarded.
  3. Criteria of selection:
    • The team must reflect ArbitralWomen's mission of promoting the participation of women in dispute resolution, i.e. at least half of the members of a team must be women.
    • The team must demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
    • Priority will be given to teams:
      • who have not previously participated, and whose school has not previously participated;
      • who have no support from their universities or no coach;
      • who come from developing countries or jurisdictions which, in the sole discretion of the Board, are in the greatest need of support for the advancement of women in dispute resolution;
      • of smaller number of students composing the team (for example 4 students as opposed to 8).
  4. An all-female team may be awarded the ArbitralWomen President’s Bursary if the other requirements are met.
  5. Nothing in this Policy prevents a team, which has already received funding in one year, from applying in future years. The Board shall treat each application on its merits and in relation to other applications received for that particular year.
  6. The Board shall effect payment to the final payee rather than directly to the team. In the event the team for any reason cannot participate, the Board at its sole option may request a refund from the organising authority, may request the organising authority to apply the funds to assist another team in that year, or may request that the funds be used to pay for another team in the following year.
  7. Funding will, in the first instance, be sought from external sponsors, who shall be identified and introduced to the sponsored team(s). Further funding by ArbitralWomen itself in any given year will be contingent upon the existence and maintenance of sufficient funds in the account of ArbitralWomen. Each year, the Board will decide the number of awards to be given in that year. Nothing in this Policy obliges the Board to provide funding in any given year.
  8. Although the ArbitralWomen Moot Bursaries are limited to payment of the registration fee, as mentioned above, there is nothing to prevent the chosen sponsors from providing additional assistance to the teams assigned as their "fundee", but any such arrangement will be made directly between the sponsor and the applicable team.
CLOSE